Buy new: $14.43
98 used and new from $0.01
Customer Rating:
First tagged "good" by foster
buy from amazon tags: kindle more than paperback, good, travel, lonliness, booker prize
Product Description
A finalist for a 2010 Man Booker Prize
In this newest novel from South African author Damon Galgut, a immature loner travels opposite eastern Africa, Europe, and India. Unsure what he's after, and demure to lapse home, he follows a paths of travelers he meets along a way. Treated as a lover, a follower, a guardian, any new encounter-with an puzzling stranger, a organisation of drifting backpackers, a lady on a verge-leads him closer to opposed his possess identity. Traversing a still of forest and a frenzy of limit crossings, each new instruction is kaleidoscopic with topping mourning, as he is propelled toward a comfortless conclusion.
In a Strange Room is a brilliant, stylish novel of annoy and compassion, yearning and thwarted desire, and a hauntingly pleasing evocation of life on a road. First published in The Paris Review in 3 parts, one of that was comparison for a National Magazine Award, and another for a O. Henry Prize, In a Strange Room was shortlisted for a 2010 Man Booker Prize.
Starred Review. There's a lot of transport in Booker Prize finalist Galgut's (The Good Doctor) new novel, though he's some-more meddlesome in depicting a randomness, heightened sensitivity, dread, and probability that come from unknown places than in saying a sights. A South African male travels in Greece, Lesotho, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Tanzania, and India, combining a complicated, gossamer relations that yield a book's 3 sections titles (Follower; Lover; Guardian). This character, who bears a author's name and seems to share his history, is both "he" and "I." Though these shifts can start in a space of a sentence, they're surprisingly easy to accept, and courteous readers will get a subtle, straightforward depiction of some of a problems of writing; "he" seems to be Galgut, though mostly practice himself as divided, uncertain, and becloud as a illusory impression escaped his creator, "I" mostly stairs in to remind us of a boundary of memory and a artificiality of genre distinctions. At a best Galgut's story has a feel of nearing in a end you'd never designed to go. It's not always pleasant, though it's strangely fascinating.
Damon Galgut was innate in Pretoria in 1963. He wrote his initial novel, A Sinless Season, when he was seventeen. His other books embody Small Circle of Beings, The Beautiful Screaming of Pigs, The Quarry, The Good Doctor and The Imposter. The Good Doctor was shortlisted for a Man Booker Prize, a Commonwealth Writers' Prize and a Dublin/IMPAC Award. He lives in Cape Town.
In a Strange Room is a extraordinary book to describe. It could good be described as both a novel or 3 stories/novellas. The anecdotist is a same via a stories, and they're heavily connected by theme. None of a other characters or events comparison their sections, yet it still felt like a novel to me. Regardless of a constructional semantics, it's eventually a story of a South African male who travels a universe (Africa, Europe and India) combining holds with his associate wanderers.
Galgut's essay prisoner me from a commencement of this novel. When he writes dialogue, he doesn't use selection marks. Instead, he adds a vacant line in between any speaker. He doesn't use doubt outlines either, that brings a piquancy and shade to many of a conversational statements that can work as both questions and statements. Using selection outlines and doubt outlines yields fewer meanings, yet Galgut avoids them and creates a obvious communication with a pleasing obscurity of poetry. He mostly uses commas to fibre together mixed sentences. His commandeering of punctuation was as hypnotizing as a musings of his characters:
"Myth always has some fact in it. And what is a face here. we don't know, this place exists, for a prolonged time people thoughts it didn't, that's a fact to start with."
Galgut seems to play with a reader too. The anecdotist jumps between first-person and third-person and offers glimpses of a future. Initially, we couldn't tell if a anecdotist was a categorical character. Galgut suggested it by jumping between initial and third-person account within a same sentence, a pretence he used several times. This switching alters a story in a possess approach as well. The reader and a anecdotist feel closer to a story during some times than others. Galgut's communication seems elementary and straightforward, yet he packs a conspicuous volume of punch into it. Some statements even extend over double entendres: "This seems to meant one thing, yet might meant another."
As many as we enjoyed Galgut's use of denunciation and pleasing characterizations of people, a musings of a visit traveler shined for me a most:
"He watches, yet what he sees isn't genuine to him. Too many travelling and placelessness have put him outward everything, so that story happens elsewhere, it has zero to do with him. He is customarily flitting through. Maybe fear is felt some-more simply from home. This is both a emancipation and an affliction, he doesn't lift any epitome dignified burdens yet their deficiency is represented for him by a period of flyblown and featureless bedrooms he sleeps in, night after night, always changing yet somehow always a same room."
"Something in him has changed, he can't seem to bond scrupulously with a world. He feels this not as a disaster of a universe yet as a large unwell in himself, he would like to change it yet doesn't know how. In his clearest moments he thinks that he has mislaid a ability to love, people or places or things, many of all a chairman and place and thing that he is. Without adore zero has value, zero can be done to matter really much. In this state transport isn't jubilee yet a kind of mourning, a approach of dissipating yourself. He moves around from one place to another, not driven by oddity yet by a wearied agonise of staying still."
Traveling and a complicated winding lifestyle are themes that ring strongly with me. I'm one who is preoccupied by a stories of those unknown faces who pass by me and wonders if their participation is applicable to my life and clamp versa. Galgut has a many some-more elegant take on those whose paths cranky ours: "Or maybe he wants to see it like this, it's customarily human, after all, to demeanour for a spirit of destiny where adore or yearning is concerned."
Part of my appreciation of this book was saying universe transport by eyes so opposite than cave and reading it filtered by a clarity we don't consider we would like to transport with. It was a extraordinary dichotomy. we was preoccupied by this actions and ideas, yet we had no enterprise to indeed rivet in a examination with this illusory character. Ultimately, we found myself vehemence intellectually some-more than emotionally about this book. we desired Galgut's writing, and we favourite a story, yet there was an regretful tie blank for me. we occur to trust that is Galgut's vigilant to illustrate a narrator's miss of regretful tie with people and places. Even this thought of goal creates me conclude a essay more. For me to fully, emotionally rivet as a reader, we need a connection. I'm a winding traveler who finds connectors to people and places everywhere. we ramble for joy.
Although it examination like a novel to me, we was distant some-more intent during a initial dual sections. we was not terribly fascinated with a third section, that has me introspective if a sequence of these fractured stories matters. The tour of reading a novel is infrequently formidable as one who chronicles her thoughts on books. we find myself essay reviews in my conduct while we read, yet we also mostly find my mind changing as a book goes on. Ultimately, my disavowal with a third territory didn't impact my altogether delight of a book as a whole, yet it did rather underwhelm.
You will know possibly we like this book or not within about 5 pages. we examination it since it's on a Man Booker longlist, and I'm blissful we persevered, yet it is approach outward my comfort zone. It's a stripped-down account told in first- and third-person (and infrequently even second), mostly within a same sentence: "he" becomes "I" and can spasmodic even be a all-encompassing "you." And this categorical clarity is named Damon, like a author.
If we can get past that, it indeed pays off. We follow Damon, a South African from Capetown, by 3 widely-spaced journeys -- Greece, Africa, and India -- and get a clarity that a time between these journeys is also spent traveling, invariably pulling adult stakes, putting things in storage, bunking with friends, etc. You usually have to put aside thoughts of how this male manages to make a vital (trust fund?), what desirous him to transport in a initial place, possibly or not he's ever had a regretful relationship, and how he manages to have friends everywhere notwithstanding demonstrating genuine problems creation tellurian connections. In fact, this final emanate we can't put aside. It's substantially a heart of a whole novel, yet we notice that other reviewers have focused on other issues.
In a initial of a 3 sections, he becomes a roving messenger of a pale German named Reiner. There are deceptive passionate overtones to trigger a relationship, yet these fast give approach to Reiner's rival and determining nature, that eventually expostulate a anecdotist to partial association with him on a remote towering in Africa. In a second section, he teams adult with a organisation of 3 Europeans (one Frenchman and a set of Swiss twins) and again has intimations of a tie with Jerome, one of a twins, that leads him to grieve over visiting them and renewing a connection. And in a third section, he undertakes a great outing to India with a crazy crony usually out of a mental hospital who has no goal of holding her meds, restricting her intake of ethanol and drugs, or differently creation life acceptable for her roving companion. Hilarity does NOT ensue.
That's a bare-bones outline. But even yet Damon is always traveling, anyone looking for internal tone or even a clarity of a slight of channel borders and vital on a highway will be disappointed. The heart of a novel lies elsewhere, in a deficiency of Damon's clarity of self. (Ah! A reason for those constantly changeable pronouns!) He knows he can't make a connectors he wants to, or that, carrying done them, he can't follow by or keep a cognisance of a impulse for any length of time during all. You consternation if he's roving to find this ability, or to equivocate carrying to understanding with a built-in cognisance of routine. The people he DOES make hit with are possibly repellent (Reiner), incompetent to promulgate (Jerome, whose English is diseased and whose inlet is shy), or deeply uneasy in ways that make spending any length of time together roughly intolerable (Anna, off her meds). He stymies himself during any turn, and ends adult -- where?
This novel is thought-provoking and has, notwithstanding a personification around with form and account a bit, an atmosphere of honesty, as if events couldn't have happened any other way. For these reasons alone, it's lovely and value reading.
"In a Strange Room," by a South African author Damon Galgut, appears on this year's (2010) Man Booker prolonged list and is a really engaging novel--actually 3 novellas, any chronicling a tour and any also chronicling a unsuccessful tellurian relationship. The narrator, who leaves his home in Capetown to ramble from place to place for reasons he can perceptibly articulate, customarily speaks in a third person, yet during times a novel shifts to initial chairman as he moves out of any story to simulate on a meaning. Has knowledge done a initial chairman orator wiser or happier? It is unfit to say.
Each story is utterly different. The first, set in Greece and Lesotho, involves a narrator's captivate to a self-contained German male who is clearly means to live happily but combining low ties with others. The second, set in Africa and in Europe, is about a yearning between a anecdotist and another man, conjunction of whom can clear his feelings. The third, set mostly in India, examines a attribute between a anecdotist and a womanlike crony whose mental illness reconfigures their relationship.
The exegesis in this novel is spare; there is usually adequate fact to settle a setting. Galgut also uses customarily a comma (instead of a semi-colon) to couple together associated clauses, and a outcome is roughly like a stutter. It helps to settle a traveler's inability to clear his deepest feelings and thoughts to others; he is means customarily to dedicate them to paper and ink. With a reader (also a kind of traveler), a anecdotist establishes a magnetism and tie that he can't find in his travels in life.
M. Feldman
In this newest novel from South African author Damon Galgut, a immature loner travels opposite eastern Africa, Europe, and India. Unsure what he's after, and demure to lapse home, he follows a paths of travelers he meets along a way. Treated as a lover, a follower, a guardian, any new encounter-with an puzzling stranger, a organisation of drifting backpackers, a lady on a verge-leads him closer to opposed his possess identity. Traversing a still of forest and a frenzy of limit crossings, each new instruction is kaleidoscopic with topping mourning, as he is propelled toward a comfortless conclusion.
In a Strange Room is a brilliant, stylish novel of annoy and compassion, yearning and thwarted desire, and a hauntingly pleasing evocation of life on a road. First published in The Paris Review in 3 parts, one of that was comparison for a National Magazine Award, and another for a O. Henry Prize, In a Strange Room was shortlisted for a 2010 Man Booker Prize.
Product Details
- Amazon Sales Rank: #149273 in Books
- Published on: 2010-10-13
- Released on: 2010-10-13
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: .90" h x 5.30" w x 8.20" l, .60 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 224 pages
Features
- ISBN13: 9781609450113
- Condition: New
- Notes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. Tracking supposing on many orders. Buy with Confidence! Millions of books sold!
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. There's a lot of transport in Booker Prize finalist Galgut's (The Good Doctor) new novel, though he's some-more meddlesome in depicting a randomness, heightened sensitivity, dread, and probability that come from unknown places than in saying a sights. A South African male travels in Greece, Lesotho, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Tanzania, and India, combining a complicated, gossamer relations that yield a book's 3 sections titles (Follower; Lover; Guardian). This character, who bears a author's name and seems to share his history, is both "he" and "I." Though these shifts can start in a space of a sentence, they're surprisingly easy to accept, and courteous readers will get a subtle, straightforward depiction of some of a problems of writing; "he" seems to be Galgut, though mostly practice himself as divided, uncertain, and becloud as a illusory impression escaped his creator, "I" mostly stairs in to remind us of a boundary of memory and a artificiality of genre distinctions. At a best Galgut's story has a feel of nearing in a end you'd never designed to go. It's not always pleasant, though it's strangely fascinating.
Review
"This is a correct and shining book." --Times
"A pleasing book, strikingly recognised and hauntingly written, a writer''s novel standard value but a awkward word in it." --The Guardian
"Galgut''s absolute essay is honest and insightful, discriminating as it is to a marble-like perfection." --The Globe and Mail
About a Author
Damon Galgut was innate in Pretoria in 1963. He wrote his initial novel, A Sinless Season, when he was seventeen. His other books embody Small Circle of Beings, The Beautiful Screaming of Pigs, The Quarry, The Good Doctor and The Imposter. The Good Doctor was shortlisted for a Man Booker Prize, a Commonwealth Writers' Prize and a Dublin/IMPAC Award. He lives in Cape Town.
Customer Reviews
Most useful patron reviews
40 of 43 people found a following examination helpful.
the stretch of travel
By Carrie Dunham-LaGree
In a Strange Room is a extraordinary book to describe. It could good be described as both a novel or 3 stories/novellas. The anecdotist is a same via a stories, and they're heavily connected by theme. None of a other characters or events comparison their sections, yet it still felt like a novel to me. Regardless of a constructional semantics, it's eventually a story of a South African male who travels a universe (Africa, Europe and India) combining holds with his associate wanderers.
Galgut's essay prisoner me from a commencement of this novel. When he writes dialogue, he doesn't use selection marks. Instead, he adds a vacant line in between any speaker. He doesn't use doubt outlines either, that brings a piquancy and shade to many of a conversational statements that can work as both questions and statements. Using selection outlines and doubt outlines yields fewer meanings, yet Galgut avoids them and creates a obvious communication with a pleasing obscurity of poetry. He mostly uses commas to fibre together mixed sentences. His commandeering of punctuation was as hypnotizing as a musings of his characters:
"Myth always has some fact in it. And what is a face here. we don't know, this place exists, for a prolonged time people thoughts it didn't, that's a fact to start with."
Galgut seems to play with a reader too. The anecdotist jumps between first-person and third-person and offers glimpses of a future. Initially, we couldn't tell if a anecdotist was a categorical character. Galgut suggested it by jumping between initial and third-person account within a same sentence, a pretence he used several times. This switching alters a story in a possess approach as well. The reader and a anecdotist feel closer to a story during some times than others. Galgut's communication seems elementary and straightforward, yet he packs a conspicuous volume of punch into it. Some statements even extend over double entendres: "This seems to meant one thing, yet might meant another."
As many as we enjoyed Galgut's use of denunciation and pleasing characterizations of people, a musings of a visit traveler shined for me a most:
"He watches, yet what he sees isn't genuine to him. Too many travelling and placelessness have put him outward everything, so that story happens elsewhere, it has zero to do with him. He is customarily flitting through. Maybe fear is felt some-more simply from home. This is both a emancipation and an affliction, he doesn't lift any epitome dignified burdens yet their deficiency is represented for him by a period of flyblown and featureless bedrooms he sleeps in, night after night, always changing yet somehow always a same room."
"Something in him has changed, he can't seem to bond scrupulously with a world. He feels this not as a disaster of a universe yet as a large unwell in himself, he would like to change it yet doesn't know how. In his clearest moments he thinks that he has mislaid a ability to love, people or places or things, many of all a chairman and place and thing that he is. Without adore zero has value, zero can be done to matter really much. In this state transport isn't jubilee yet a kind of mourning, a approach of dissipating yourself. He moves around from one place to another, not driven by oddity yet by a wearied agonise of staying still."
Traveling and a complicated winding lifestyle are themes that ring strongly with me. I'm one who is preoccupied by a stories of those unknown faces who pass by me and wonders if their participation is applicable to my life and clamp versa. Galgut has a many some-more elegant take on those whose paths cranky ours: "Or maybe he wants to see it like this, it's customarily human, after all, to demeanour for a spirit of destiny where adore or yearning is concerned."
Part of my appreciation of this book was saying universe transport by eyes so opposite than cave and reading it filtered by a clarity we don't consider we would like to transport with. It was a extraordinary dichotomy. we was preoccupied by this actions and ideas, yet we had no enterprise to indeed rivet in a examination with this illusory character. Ultimately, we found myself vehemence intellectually some-more than emotionally about this book. we desired Galgut's writing, and we favourite a story, yet there was an regretful tie blank for me. we occur to trust that is Galgut's vigilant to illustrate a narrator's miss of regretful tie with people and places. Even this thought of goal creates me conclude a essay more. For me to fully, emotionally rivet as a reader, we need a connection. I'm a winding traveler who finds connectors to people and places everywhere. we ramble for joy.
Although it examination like a novel to me, we was distant some-more intent during a initial dual sections. we was not terribly fascinated with a third section, that has me introspective if a sequence of these fractured stories matters. The tour of reading a novel is infrequently formidable as one who chronicles her thoughts on books. we find myself essay reviews in my conduct while we read, yet we also mostly find my mind changing as a book goes on. Ultimately, my disavowal with a third territory didn't impact my altogether delight of a book as a whole, yet it did rather underwhelm.
17 of 17 people found a following examination helpful.
Is all transport a hunt for tellurian connection?
By a reader
You will know possibly we like this book or not within about 5 pages. we examination it since it's on a Man Booker longlist, and I'm blissful we persevered, yet it is approach outward my comfort zone. It's a stripped-down account told in first- and third-person (and infrequently even second), mostly within a same sentence: "he" becomes "I" and can spasmodic even be a all-encompassing "you." And this categorical clarity is named Damon, like a author.
If we can get past that, it indeed pays off. We follow Damon, a South African from Capetown, by 3 widely-spaced journeys -- Greece, Africa, and India -- and get a clarity that a time between these journeys is also spent traveling, invariably pulling adult stakes, putting things in storage, bunking with friends, etc. You usually have to put aside thoughts of how this male manages to make a vital (trust fund?), what desirous him to transport in a initial place, possibly or not he's ever had a regretful relationship, and how he manages to have friends everywhere notwithstanding demonstrating genuine problems creation tellurian connections. In fact, this final emanate we can't put aside. It's substantially a heart of a whole novel, yet we notice that other reviewers have focused on other issues.
In a initial of a 3 sections, he becomes a roving messenger of a pale German named Reiner. There are deceptive passionate overtones to trigger a relationship, yet these fast give approach to Reiner's rival and determining nature, that eventually expostulate a anecdotist to partial association with him on a remote towering in Africa. In a second section, he teams adult with a organisation of 3 Europeans (one Frenchman and a set of Swiss twins) and again has intimations of a tie with Jerome, one of a twins, that leads him to grieve over visiting them and renewing a connection. And in a third section, he undertakes a great outing to India with a crazy crony usually out of a mental hospital who has no goal of holding her meds, restricting her intake of ethanol and drugs, or differently creation life acceptable for her roving companion. Hilarity does NOT ensue.
That's a bare-bones outline. But even yet Damon is always traveling, anyone looking for internal tone or even a clarity of a slight of channel borders and vital on a highway will be disappointed. The heart of a novel lies elsewhere, in a deficiency of Damon's clarity of self. (Ah! A reason for those constantly changeable pronouns!) He knows he can't make a connectors he wants to, or that, carrying done them, he can't follow by or keep a cognisance of a impulse for any length of time during all. You consternation if he's roving to find this ability, or to equivocate carrying to understanding with a built-in cognisance of routine. The people he DOES make hit with are possibly repellent (Reiner), incompetent to promulgate (Jerome, whose English is diseased and whose inlet is shy), or deeply uneasy in ways that make spending any length of time together roughly intolerable (Anna, off her meds). He stymies himself during any turn, and ends adult -- where?
This novel is thought-provoking and has, notwithstanding a personification around with form and account a bit, an atmosphere of honesty, as if events couldn't have happened any other way. For these reasons alone, it's lovely and value reading.
10 of 11 people found a following examination helpful.
Wandering
By M. Feldman
"In a Strange Room," by a South African author Damon Galgut, appears on this year's (2010) Man Booker prolonged list and is a really engaging novel--actually 3 novellas, any chronicling a tour and any also chronicling a unsuccessful tellurian relationship. The narrator, who leaves his home in Capetown to ramble from place to place for reasons he can perceptibly articulate, customarily speaks in a third person, yet during times a novel shifts to initial chairman as he moves out of any story to simulate on a meaning. Has knowledge done a initial chairman orator wiser or happier? It is unfit to say.
Each story is utterly different. The first, set in Greece and Lesotho, involves a narrator's captivate to a self-contained German male who is clearly means to live happily but combining low ties with others. The second, set in Africa and in Europe, is about a yearning between a anecdotist and another man, conjunction of whom can clear his feelings. The third, set mostly in India, examines a attribute between a anecdotist and a womanlike crony whose mental illness reconfigures their relationship.
The exegesis in this novel is spare; there is usually adequate fact to settle a setting. Galgut also uses customarily a comma (instead of a semi-colon) to couple together associated clauses, and a outcome is roughly like a stutter. It helps to settle a traveler's inability to clear his deepest feelings and thoughts to others; he is means customarily to dedicate them to paper and ink. With a reader (also a kind of traveler), a anecdotist establishes a magnetism and tie that he can't find in his travels in life.
M. Feldman
0 comments:
Post a Comment